The Supreme Court mandates that citizenship determination by Foreigners Tribunals must adhere to fair, reasonable procedures, strictly upholding natural justice. Mechanical declarations based on technical errors violate constitutional rights, emphasizing that reverse burden of proof cannot bypass judicial due process.
Click to View MoreThe recent four-state agreement over the Narmada River resolves decades-old financial disputes regarding the Sardar Sarovar Project. This landmark pact strengthens cooperative federalism, advances sustainable water governance, and addresses long-standing rehabilitation challenges under the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal framework.
Click to View MoreBar Associations cannot legally prevent advocates from representing accused individuals. The Supreme Court categorizes collective boycotts as unconstitutional. The Indian Constitution, under Articles 21, 22(1), and 39A, strictly guarantees every citizen the absolute right to legal representation and a fair trial.
Click to View MoreDefault bail is an indefeasible fundamental right under Article 21, protecting accused individuals from indefinite pre-trial detention if police fail to file a charge sheet within 60/90 days. However, recent Supreme Court rulings under the BNSS clarify that mere procedural delays in supplying document copies do not trigger this right.
Click to View MoreThe NIRD & PR national study reveals severe participation fatigue in Gram Sabhas due to livelihood pressures, lack of visible outcomes, and proxy leadership like 'Sarpanch Pati'. Reinvigorating grassroots democracy requires digital inclusion, flexible scheduling, and empowering marginalized voices for transparent governance.
Click to View MoreSection 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 empowers the Indian government to block public access to digital content to defend national security and public order. Despite procedural safeguards upheld by the Supreme Court, concerns persist regarding transparency and due process.
Click to View MoreThe Panchayat Advancement Index (PAI) 2.0, an analytics-driven framework by the Ministry of Panchayati Raj evaluating local bodies across nine SDG themes, won the Gold Award at the National Awards for e-Governance 2026 for digital transformation in rural India.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court of India has issued comprehensive guidelines to combat child trafficking and trace missing children by establishing a nationwide victim protection plan, presuming kidnapping in missing cases, and mandating sensitive judicial evaluation of victim testimonies for rehabilitation.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls, affirming its statutory validity under the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The verdict clarified that Aadhaar serves as identity, not proof of citizenship, balancing electoral purity with due process and voter rights.
Click to View MoreThe Election Commission of India appointment process shifted from executive discretion to a statutory framework under the 2023 Act, replacing the Chief Justice of India with a Cabinet Minister, raising concerns over executive dominance and electoral independence.
Click to View MoreIn a hung assembly, the Governor uses constitutional discretion to appoint a Chief Minister. They sequentially invite pre-poll alliances, the largest party, or post-poll coalitions to prove their majority on the assembly floor.
Click to View MoreThe Model Code of Conduct ensures free and fair elections by regulating political entities. Lacking direct statutory backing, its enforcement relies on Article 324. Emerging challenges like deepfakes and freebies necessitate modernizing the framework with robust legal and digital tools.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved
