Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy: The Hindu

Context:

The Supreme Court has stayed (paused) its own November 20, 2025 judgment that defined Aravalli hills as only those 100 metres or more in height, and within 500 metres of each other.

Supreme Court interventions on Aravalli’s:

Key Highlights of recent Supreme court verdict:

Stay on earlier Supreme Court decision: The Supreme Court has put on hold its earlier order of November 20 that had approved a single, uniform definition of what constitutes the Aravalli hills. 

Reason for granting the stay: The Court acted after widespread criticism and concern expressed by environmental experts and civil society groups that the earlier definition could weaken protection and harm the fragile Aravalli ecosystem. 

Constitution of a fresh expert panel: A Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India has directed the creation of a new high-level expert committee, which will reconsider how the Aravalli range should be scientifically identified and demarcated. 

Directions relating to mining activities: The Court has made it clear that no new mining leases or renewals in the Aravalli region will be permitted unless specific approval is obtained from the Supreme Court, thereby strengthening the application of the precautionary approach in environmental matters. 

Notices to centre and Aravalli states: The Supreme Court has also issued notices to the Union government and the governments of Rajasthan, Gujarat, Haryana, and Delhi, asking them to respond in the suo motu proceedings concerning the protection and definition of the Aravalli hills. 

What are the broader implications of the Supreme Court’s order?

Immediate protection status strengthened: By staying its earlier definition and halting new mining leases, the Court has temporarily reinforced legal protection over large parts of the Aravalli range that might otherwise have lost coverage. 

Prevention of irreversible environmental damage: The order prevents potentially irreversible ecological harm such as landscape fragmentation, loss of biodiversity, groundwater depletion, and worsening air quality while the issue is re-examined.

Check on unregulated and opportunistic mining: Since no new or renewed mining leases are allowed without Supreme Court permission, the judgment acts as a strong brake on mining expansion, particularly in lower and fragmented hill patches. 

Recognition of ecological integrity over technical definitions: The Court signals that the Aravallis should not be defined merely by height or distance criteria, but by their overall ecological continuity and function, shifting focus from technical thresholds to ecosystem integrity.

Application of the precautionary principle: The judgment reinforces the precautionary principle by insisting that economic or administrative actions must wait until scientific clarity is achieved on environmental consequences. 

Reopening the debate on the definition of Aravallis: The constitution of a new expert committee implies that the earlier “100-metre height and 500-metre cluster” definition is not final, opening space for a broader, science-based and conservation-oriented demarcation. 

Empowerment of scientific and expert input: By insisting on independent expert assessment and multi-stakeholder consultation, the Court is shifting decision-making toward technical expertise, not merely administrative committees. 

Implications for urbanisation and real estate projects: Projects planned on the assumption of reduced protection—especially in Haryana, Rajasthan and Delhi-NCR—now face uncertainty, tighter scrutiny, and possible restriction. 

Signal to state governments on dilution attempts: The order sends a strong message that dilution of environmental safeguards through definitional changes or zoning relaxations will face strict judicial review.

 Stronger linkage between Aravallis and NCR environmental health: By acknowledging the Aravallis’ role in blocking desert expansion, regulating temperature and improving air quality, the Court implicitly ties the issue to public health and Article 21 (right to life).

Significance of Aravalli:

Ecological barrier against desert expansion: The Aravalli range acts as a natural wall that prevents the eastward spread of the Thar Desert. It protects regions such as Haryana, Delhi–NCR, western Uttar Pradesh and parts of the Indo-Gangetic plains, and its degradation accelerates desertification, dust storms and land degradation.

Regulator of Climate and Groundwater Recharge: The Aravallis are crucial for groundwater recharge and local climate regulation. They help moderate temperature extremes, but unchecked quarrying and land clearance have reduced infiltration and contributed to falling groundwater levels in NCR and western India. 

Habitat for Biodiversity and Wildlife Movement: The Aravallis serve as an important biodiversity refuge and wildlife corridor. They support dry deciduous forests and scrub ecosystems and enable wildlife movement between Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh landscapes. 

Hydrological importance: The Aravalli system is linked to the origin and flow of several major rivers. It influences rivers such as the Sabarmati, Luni and Chambal, making it vital for regional water availability and hydrological stability. 

Mineral Resources: The Aravallis are among the world’s oldest mountain ranges and possess rich mineral resources. However, decades of poorly regulated mining for minerals like copper, zinc, marble and granite have caused serious ecological degradation. 

Conclusion:

The recent Supreme Court order prioritises ecological protection over narrow technical definitions by pausing new mining approvals and reopening the Aravalli definition to expert scientific review. It prevents irreversible damage for now and signals that any dilution of safeguards for the Aravallis will face strict judicial scrutiny.