The Judges Inquiry Committee is a vital three-member statutory tribunal formed under the Judges Inquiry Act 1968 to investigate charges of proved misbehaviour or incapacity against a judge, ensuring strict accountability while safeguarding judicial independence from arbitrary, frivolous political interference.
Click to View MoreThe Indian Constitution empowers the President and Governors to promulgate ordinances during legislative recess for emergent situations. However, frequent re-promulgation and recent uses, like increasing Supreme Court judges to 38, raise concerns regarding parliamentary supremacy and separation of powers.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court of India launched the "One Case One Data" initiative to unify judicial records across all court levels and the "Su Sahay" AI chatbot to assist citizens with e-services, enhancing transparency, accessibility, and case management efficiency.
Click to View MoreThe Election Commission of India appointment process shifted from executive discretion to a statutory framework under the 2023 Act, replacing the Chief Justice of India with a Cabinet Minister, raising concerns over executive dominance and electoral independence.
Click to View MoreThe MTP Amendment Act 2021 and Supreme Court rulings expanded women's reproductive rights in India. However, mandatory reporting under the POCSO Act and severe systemic healthcare barriers continue to restrict safe abortion access for vulnerable, young adolescents today
Click to View MoreThe recent ruling by the Supreme Court of India recognises access to menstrual hygiene as part of fundamental rights, linking it to equality, dignity, privacy, and the right to education. The Court held that lack of sanitary products and proper school facilities forces many girls to miss classes, which amounts to structural discrimination under Article 14 and a violation of dignity under Article 21. It directed governments to provide free sanitary napkins, functional and private toilets, safe disposal systems, menstrual hygiene support spaces, and awareness through school curricula, making menstrual health a legal and educational priority rather than a welfare issue.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court has stayed its earlier judgment that accepted a uniform definition of the Aravalli hills based on height and cluster criteria. It took this step after concerns that the definition could reduce protection for large parts of the Aravalli range and encourage mining and construction. The Court has paused the grant or renewal of mining leases in the region without its permission and proposed setting up a high-powered expert committee to scientifically reassess the definition. The order emphasises the precautionary principle and underscores that the Aravallis must be protected as an integrated ecological system until a final decision is reached.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved