Description

Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy: LIVEMINT

Context

The proliferation of AI-generated content, particularly deepfakes, has become a significant global concern, threatening societal trust and national security.

Read all about: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN GOVERNANCE l IS THE AI BOOM SUSTAINABLE? EXPLAINED l ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN MILITARY OPERATIONS l AI TRANSFORMING TEACHING AND LEARNING l DESIGNING INDIA'S AI SAFETY INSTITUTE (AISI) l SKILLING FOR AI READINESS (SOAR) PROGRAM l NEW RULES FOR AI CONTENT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

What is AI-Generated Content?

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated content, also known as synthetic media, refers to text, images, audio, and video created by AI systems like generative models.

Its increasing sophistication and accessibility have deep implications for national security, public trust, and social cohesion.

This content is fundamentally different from traditional media because it democratizes the ability to create highly realistic forgeries, a skill once limited to experts.

Security Risks of AI-Generated Content

Threats to National Security

AI-generated content poses a serious threat to national security, by accelerating the spread of disinformation.

Manipulation and Destabilization: Deepfake technology (video and audio) allows the creation of synthetic media of public figures to manipulate opinion, incite violence, and destabilize governance (e.g., a deepfake of a political leader announcing surrender).

Blurring Reality: The ease of creating synthetic media makes it difficult for both citizens and authorities to distinguish between truth and fiction and respond to genuine threats.

Weaponized Disinformation: Creating false narratives and impersonating officials to undermine democratic processes.

Erosion of Trust (The "Liar's Dividend"): The flood of synthetic media can cause real, verifiable evidence to be dismissed as fake, severely eroding public trust in institutions.

Critical Infrastructure Attacks: Malicious actors can use AI to facilitate disruptions of essential operations (e.g., power grids, transportation systems).

Cybercrime and Financial Fraud

The rise of Generative AI has provided cybercriminals with a powerful new tool, increasing the scale and sophistication of fraudulent activities.

Deepfakes: This technology is now implicated in 6.5% of all fraud attacks, representing a huge 2,137% increase since 2022 (Tech Advisors, 2025).

The financial impact is severe, with businesses losing an average of nearly $500,000 per deepfake-related incident in 2024 (Keepnet Labs, 2025).

Sophisticated Phishing: AI is used to create highly convincing phishing emails, with 82.6% of current phishing emails employing AI technology (Tech Advisors, 2025).

These sophisticated scams have a much higher success rate, leading to 78% of recipients opening them.

Targeted Impersonation: AI-cloned voices are being used in scams to impersonate high-level executives or family members, coercing targets into authorizing fraudulent financial transfers.
Identity Theft: Criminals are creating synthetic identities for a range of illicit activities, including opening bank accounts and bypassing standard security protocols.

Social Impacts and Erosion of Trust

Decline in Trust in Media and Institutions

The inability to distinguish real content from AI-generated fakes leads to widespread skepticism and a decline in public trust.

When people are constantly exposed to hyper-realistic deepfakes, they may begin to doubt the authenticity of all digital content, including verified news from credible sources.

This erosion of a shared factual basis is detrimental to informed public discourse and the functioning of democracy.

Societal Harms and Personal Damage

Beyond politics, AI-generated content inflicts serious personal and social harm. A major concern is the creation of non-consensual explicit content, predominantly targeting women.

Studies show that 98% of deepfake videos are pornographic, and of those, a vast majority use the likeness of women without their consent (Source: Tech Advisors, 2025). Other harms include:

Harassment and Defamation: Creating fake content to damage an individual's reputation or incite harassment.
Marginalization: Using AI to create biased content that reinforces harmful stereotypes and further marginalizes vulnerable groups.

Global Legal and Policy Frameworks

Global governments are struggling to regulate AI-generated content, with diverse approaches reflecting legal and cultural differences, aiming to balance innovation and free speech.

Jurisdiction	Key Regulations and Approach
India	IT Rules, 2021 (Amended 2023 & 2025): Amendments in October 2025 to mandate the clear labeling of AI-generated content. Platforms are required to make "reasonable efforts" to prevent users from hosting or sharing unlawful synthetic content. Proposed Labeling Mandate: Requires a visible label covering at least 10% of visuals or the initial 10% of an audio clip to identify it as AI-generated. Existing Laws: The IT Act, 2000, Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, provide avenues to tackle identity theft, privacy violations, and impersonation.
European Union	EU AI Act (Operative 2024): Adopts a risk-based approach. Systems generating deepfakes must comply with transparency obligations, clearly disclosing that the content is AI-generated (Article 50). High-Risk Classification: Deepfake technology used in high-risk areas like elections or law enforcement is subject to stricter controls. Digital Services Act (DSA): Complements the AI Act by regulating online platform liability for illegal content, including harmful deepfakes.
United States	Federal Legislation: The TAKE IT DOWN Act targeting non-consensual deepfake pornography. It mandates a notice-and-takedown process for online platforms. State Laws: A patchwork of state laws exists. By August 2025, 47 states had enacted some form of legislation against deepfakes.

Way Forward

Technical Measures

Technology offers the first line of defense, though it is not a complete solution. The field is a constant cat-and-mouse game between content generation and detection.

AI Detection Tools: Several tools claim high accuracy (over 90%) in identifying AI-generated content by analyzing artifacts, inconsistencies, or even biological signals like "blood flow" in pixels (e.g., Intel's FakeCatcher). However, their real-world effectiveness varies.
Digital Watermarking: Involves embedding an imperceptible digital signature into AI-generated content at the point of creation to verify its origin. Google's SynthID is a prominent example of this technology.
Content Provenance: Securely embedding metadata that tracks the origin and history of a piece of content, similar to a digital chain of custody.

Policy and Institutional Responses

Effective governance requires clear rules, platform accountability, and collaboration.

Clear Regulations: Establish clear legal definitions for harmful synthetic content and impose penalties for malicious creation and distribution.
Platform Responsibility: Hold social media platforms and AI model developers accountable for the content they host and generate, mandating measures like labeling and rapid takedown of harmful material.
International Cooperation: Foster global norms and standards for the responsible development and deployment of generative AI.

Social and Educational Solutions

Building societal resilience is crucial for long-term mitigation.

Digital Literacy: Launch widespread public education campaigns to teach citizens how to critically evaluate online information and recognize the signs of AI-generated content.
Media Literacy Programs: Integrate media literacy into school curricula to equip the next generation with the skills to navigate a complex information environment.

Conclusion

Mitigating the risks of AI-generated content—from national security threats and fraud to eroding public trust—requires a multi-layered strategy including technical detection, enforceable legal frameworks, platform accountability, and enhanced public digital literacy.

Source: LIVEMINT

Attempt Daily Quiz

PRACTICE QUESTION

Q. Discuss the social and security implications of AI-generated content in the Indian context. 150 words

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

AI-generated content, or synthetic media, is any text, image, audio, or video created by AI. Deepfakes are a specific type, referring to hyper-realistic videos or audio where a person's likeness is digitally altered or replaced, making it extremely difficult to distinguish from authentic content.

Deepfakes can be weaponized by hostile state and non-state actors to spread disinformation, manipulate public opinion during elections, incite social unrest, and conduct psychological warfare, thereby directly threatening a nation's security and stability.

The Digital India Act is a proposed legislative framework intended to replace the outdated IT Act, 2000. It is expected to include specific provisions for regulating high-risk AI systems, penalizing platforms that fail to curb harmful content, and reforming the "safe harbour" protection for intermediaries.