Source: NHPC INDIA
Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Parbati-II project is a crucial hydropower initiative by NHPC in Himachal Pradesh aiming to enhance Indian renewable energy capacity & mitigate flood risks despite significant delays & engineering challenges.
|
Parameter |
Details |
|
Project Name |
Parbati II Hydroelectric Project |
|
Type |
Run of river hydroelectric scheme |
|
River |
Parbati River |
|
Location |
District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh |
|
Approach |
Nearest Railhead Kiratpur; Nearest Airport Bhuntar (Kullu) |
|
Installed Capacity |
800 MW (4 × 200 MW) |
|
Design Energy |
3124.6 Million Units (MU) (90% dependable year) |
|
Project Cost |
₹3,919.59 Crores (at December 2001 price level) |
|
Beneficiary States/UTs |
Himachal Pradesh, Delhi, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh & Union Territory of Chandigarh |
|
Purpose |
Hydropower generation & flood mitigation |
|
Dam Type |
Concrete Gravity Dam |
|
Dam Height |
83.7 meters |
|
Water Diversion Mechanism |
The river is diverted at Pulga village in Parbati Valley through a 31.52 km-long Head Race Tunnel (HRT) |
|
Powerhouse Location |
Suind village in Sainj Valley |
|
Gross Head Utilized |
863 meters (Pulga to Suind) |
|
Additional Water Sources |
Various nallahs along Head Race Tunnel alignment contribute to water diversion |
|
Surge Shaft |
130 m high, 17 m diameter Orifice-type surge shaft |
|
Head Race Tunnel (HRT) |
31.52 km long, 6 m diameter tunnel |
|
Pressure Shafts |
2 pressure shafts of 3.5 m diameter each |
|
Length of Pressure Shafts |
Right - 2,121.5 m; Left - 2,149.5 m |
|
Tail Race Channels |
4 channels, 60m long, dimensions 5m × 4.5m each |
|
Powerhouse Type |
Surface powerhouse |
|
Turbine Type |
Pelton Turbines |
|
Number of Generating Units |
4 units of 200 MW each |
|
Switchyard |
400 KV GIS Surface Switchyard with 2 outgoing 400 KV feeders |
|
Challenges Faced |
Geological difficulties, tunneling issues, silt seepage, flash floods & water ingress delays |
|
Annual Energy Generation |
Approximately 3,074 MU per year |
|
Significance |
Major contributor to renewable energy, hydropower production & flood risk mitigation along Parbati River |
|
Parameter |
Details |
|
Full Name |
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) Limited |
|
Established |
1975 |
|
Headquarters |
Faridabad, Haryana, India |
|
Ownership |
Government of India (Public Sector Undertaking) |
|
Sector |
Hydropower & Renewable Energy |
|
Primary Role |
Development of hydroelectric power projects in India |
|
Total Installed Capacity |
7,097.2 MW (as of 2023) |
|
Number of Power Stations |
24 Hydro, 1 Solar, 1 Wind |
|
Key Hydroelectric Projects |
Teesta-V (Sikkim), Dhauliganga (Uttarakhand), Subansiri Lower (Arunachal Pradesh/Assam), Chamera (Himachal Pradesh), Parbati-II (Himachal Pradesh), Salal (J&K) |
|
Total Projects Under Construction |
16 projects (with a total capacity of 10,789 MW) |
|
Major International Ventures |
Bhutan (Punatsangchhu-I & II, Mangdechhu HEP) |
|
Diversification into Renewables |
Expanding into solar & wind energy projects |
|
Significance in India's Power Sector |
One of India’s largest hydropower developers, crucial for renewable energy transition |
|
Market Listing |
Listed on BSE & NSE (Stock Exchange) |
|
Government Stake |
Majority ownership with Government of India |
|
Vision |
Sustainable energy development with an emphasis on hydro & renewable sources |
|
Parameter |
Details |
|
Location |
Himachal Pradesh, India |
|
Origin |
Near Mantalai Glacier in Pin Parbati Pass (Kullu district, Himachal Pradesh) |
|
Length |
90 km (approximate) |
|
Elevation of Source |
Around 5,200 meters (17,060 feet) above sea level |
|
Major Tributaries |
Tos Nala, Dibibokri Nala, Malana Nala |
|
Passes Along Course |
Pin Parbati Pass (connects Kullu & Spiti Valley) |
|
Flow Through |
Manikaran, Kasol, Pulga, Bhuntar (Kullu) |
|
Confluence |
Joins Beas River near Bhuntar in Kullu district |
|
Hydroelectric Projects |
Parbati Hydroelectric Projects (Stages I, II & III) |
|
Parbati-II Project Details |
Utilizes water diversion at Pulga to Suind with an 800 MW power generation capacity |
|
Religious Significance |
Manikaran Sahib (Sikh pilgrimage site) & Hot Water Springs along river banks |
|
Tourism Importance |
Kasol, Tosh, Kheerganga Trek, Manikaran attract trekkers & tourists |
|
Environmental Challenges |
Flash floods, landslides, deforestation, hydropower project impact |
|
Ecological Importance |
Home to alpine forests, rich biodiversity & snow-fed streams crucial for Himalayan ecosystems |
Type of hydropower generation that utilizes natural flow & elevation drop of a river to generate electricity without creating a large reservoir or significant water storage.
|
Feature |
Details |
|
Water Storage |
Minimal or no storage; relies on river's natural flow. |
|
Reservoir |
No large reservoir; only a small pondage to regulate short term fluctuations. |
|
Environmental Impact |
Lower ecological impact compared to large dams but may affect aquatic ecosystems & sediment transport. |
|
Working Mechanism |
Diverts river water through a headrace tunnel/channel → Water flows through turbines → Electricity generated → Water returns to river downstream. |
|
Energy Dependence |
Highly dependent on river discharge (seasonal variations affect power generation). |
|
Ideal Locations |
Mountainous & hilly regions with steep gradients for natural elevation drop. |
|
Advantages |
Minimal displacement of people, reduced risk of dam failure & lower carbon footprint. |
|
Challenges |
Seasonal flow variations, silt accumulation, limited power regulation & potential ecological concerns. |
|
Project Name |
River |
Capacity |
State |
|
Parbati-II |
Parbati |
800 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
|
Karcham Wangtoo |
Satluj |
1,200 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
|
Rampur HEP |
Satluj |
412 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
|
Teesta-III |
Teesta |
1,200 MW |
Sikkim |
|
Teesta-V |
Teesta |
510 MW |
Sikkim |
|
Lower Subansiri |
Subansiri |
2,000 MW |
Arunachal Pradesh/Assam |
|
Uri-I & Uri-II |
Jhelum |
480 MW |
Jammu & Kashmir |
|
Dhauliganga HEP |
Dhauliganga |
280 MW |
Uttarakhand |
|
Baglihar Hydroelectric Project |
Chenab |
900 MW |
Jammu & Kashmir |
|
Chamera-III |
Ravi |
231 MW |
Himachal Pradesh |
|
Project Name |
River |
Country |
Capacity |
|
Three Gorges Dam (RoR Component) |
Yangtze |
China |
22,500 MW |
|
Belo Monte Dam |
Xingu |
Brazil |
11,233 MW |
|
La Yesca Dam |
Santiago |
Mexico |
750 MW |
|
Mica Dam |
Columbia |
Canada |
2,805 MW |
|
Jinping-I Dam |
Yalong |
China |
3,600 MW |
For more information, please refer to IAS GYAN
Sources: CNBC TV18
|
PRACTICE QUESTION Q.Discuss significance of Run-of-River (RoR) hydroelectric projects in Indian renewable energy sector. Highlight their advantages, challenges & compare them with conventional dam-based hydropower projects. |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved