IAS Gyan

Daily News Analysis


24th January, 2023 International Relations

Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.

Context: External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who was in Colombo, said he shared India’s “considered view” with President Ranil Wickremesinghe that the full implementation of the 13th Amendment was “critical” for power devolution.



  • Sri Lanka’s current Constitution, adopted in 1978, has had 21 amendments to date, but arguably, none as controversial as this.
  • Passed in November 1987, months after Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and Sri Lankan President J.R. Jayewardene signed the Indo-Lanka Accord, the 13th Amendment is the only legislative guarantee of a measure of power devolution to the island’s provinces.
  • It provided for setting up provincial governments across the country — there are nine provincial councils — and made Tamil, too, an official language, and English, a link language.


  • It was, in some measure, an antidote to the ‘Sinhala Only Act’ of 1956, one of the most discriminatory laws passed targeting the island’s Tamil minorities, after the Ceylon Citizenship Act of 1948 that rendered Sri Lanka’s Malaiyaha Tamils of Indian origin stateless.
  • It also sought to address the Tamils’ right to self-determination which, by the 1980s, had become a raging political call.
  • With the 1983 anti-Tamil pogrom laying bare violent Sinhala majoritarianism and racism, it was hard for the world and India not to appreciate a legitimate demand.


  • For successive governments, devolving power to the provinces as per the 13th Amendment, including in the Tamil-majority north and east, was hardly on their ‘must do’ list.
  • Despite public promises, leaders from the Sinhala-majority south failed to implement in letter and spirit what was already in the Constitution.
  • Detractors construe the 13th Amendment as an “Indian imposition”, despite it being an outcome of a bilateral Accord signed by J. R. Jayewardene, one of the island’s most powerful Presidents.
  • The provincial councils function, but nominally.
  • The rule book gave provinces legislative power over agriculture, education, health, housing, local government, planning, road transport and social services. But an ambiguous concurrent list and overriding clauses in the Constitution allow the Centre to remain all-powerful.
  • The executive President still wields enormous power and the provincial Governors, representing the country’s highest office, possess similar power at the regional level.
  • The last three decades are rife with attempts by the Centre to take back power.

Concerns for Sri Lankan government and Tamils:

  • Colombo is especially wary of sharing land and police powers, and resolutely controls the subjects.
  • The island’s southern leaders are reluctant to share power with the Tamil minorities, as well as their own people governing the provinces
  • For the Tamils, on the other hand, the 13th Amendment is too little. The LTTE rejected it. Among the current Tamil polity, almost all see it as inadequate. The problem, though, is not just to do with the Amendment, but Sri Lanka’s unitary Constitution
  • Tamils have rejected it on the grounds that for as long as the structure of the State remains Unitary, no meaningful autonomy and self-government can be achieved.

Why is the 13th Amendment significant?

  • Till date, the 13th Amendment represents the only constitutional provision on the settlement of the long-pending Tamil question.
  • In addition to assuring a measure of devolution, it is considered part of the few significant gains since the 1980s, in the face of growing Sinhala-Buddhist majoritarianism from the time Sri Lanka became independent in 1948.