Supreme Court Judgments

ARAVALLI RANGE CONSERVATION: CHALLENGES, POLICY GAPS AND THE WAY FORWARD

The Supreme Court’s 100-metre elevation rule for the Aravallis threatens over 90% of India's oldest fold mountains. Urgent landscape-level conservation and the Aravalli Green Wall Project are critical to prevent desertification, water scarcity, and severe pollution across North-West India.

Click to View More
AADHAAR AS IDENTITY PROOF, NOT CITIZENSHIP PROOF: CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL ISSUES

The Supreme Court is currently examining the misuse of Aadhaar as proof of citizenship and age. Governed strictly by the Aadhaar Act 2016, Aadhaar merely establishes resident identity for subsidies but legally cannot determine Indian citizenship, domicile, or date of birth.

Click to View More
PREVENTIVE DETENTION IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, JUDICIAL SAFEGUARDS AND CONCERNS OVER MISUSE

Preventive detention laws in India allow the government to detain individuals without trial for up to three months to prevent potential crimes. Authorized under Article 22 of the Constitution, these laws protect national security and public order but face civil rights criticism.

Click to View More
EQUALITY OF TREATMENT FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: FROM WELFARE APPROACH TO RIGHTS-BASED INCLUSION

India's fragmented disability pensions currently leave millions vulnerable, as the nation spends merely 0.02% of its GDP on welfare. Establishing a Minimum Universal Disability Pension Floor Rate (MUDPFR) transforms discretionary state charity into guaranteed constitutional rights, driving robust economic growth

Click to View More
PCPNDT ACT: SUPREME COURT CALLS FOR STRICT ENFORCEMENT AGAINST SEX SELECTION

The PCPNDT Act 1994 prohibits sex selection to combat female foeticide and declining child sex ratios in India. Despite census improvements, the Supreme Court demands strict enforcement and meticulous record-keeping to eradicate deep-seated patriarchal biases and protect the girl child.

Click to View More
ORDINANCE QUESTION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT: CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE, ISSUES AND WAY FORWARD

The Indian Constitution allows the executive to promulgate ordinances during emergencies under Articles 123 and 213. However, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that unfettered re-promulgation without legislative approval subverts democratic processes, violating the core principle of parliamentary supremacy.

Click to View More
HOW THE ARAVALLI RANGE BLOCKS THAR DESERT DUST

The Aravalli Range, North India’s crucial dust and desertification shield, faces severe degradation. Recent Supreme Court rulings redefining the hills for mining regulations have sparked ecological concerns, amplifying the urgent need for the Aravalli Green Wall eco-restoration project.

Click to View More
SUPREME COURT ON SIR: CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS OF THE ELECTION COMMISSION EXPLAINED

The Supreme Court upheld the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls, affirming its statutory validity under the Representation of the People Act, 1950. The verdict clarified that Aadhaar serves as identity, not proof of citizenship, balancing electoral purity with due process and voter rights.

Click to View More
VICTIM-CENTRIC CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDIA

India’s criminal justice system is embracing a victim-centric model through the BNSS 2023, guaranteeing structured victim compensation, active procedural participation, and timely updates. This transition successfully balances restorative justice mechanisms with retributive frameworks while protecting the accused's constitutional rights.

Click to View More
SUPREME COURT ON UAPA: BALANCING NATIONAL SECURITY AND ARTICLE 21

The Supreme Court's UAPA bail jurisprudence highlights the conflict between national security and personal liberty. While Section 43D(5) imposes strict statutory bail restrictions, courts invoke Article 21 to grant relief in cases of prolonged incarceration, ensuring constitutional rights prevail.

Click to View More
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT LAWS IN INDIA

The PoSH Act of 2013 mandates safe working environments for women by prohibiting workplace sexual harassment. It establishes Internal and Local Complaints Committees for redressal and emphasizes prevention, accountability, and the protection of fundamental constitutional rights.

Click to View More
SUPREME COURT ON SPECIAL LAW FOR HATE CRIMES

The Supreme Court declined a separate anti-racial slur law, citing Article 14 equality concerns. The 2026 Anjel Chakma case revived debate over BNS adequacy versus Bezbaruah Committee proposals. Unlike Tehseen Poonawalla (2018), the Court favors aggravated sentencing and police sensitization to address bias crimes without deepening polarization.

Click to View More
Let's Get In Touch!