India's voting right remains purely statutory, not fundamental. However, recent Supreme Court rulings protect electoral facets like informed choice. Elevating the ballot to a fundamental right is crucial to prevent arbitrary disenfranchisement and protect vulnerable undertrial prisoners from unjust exclusion.
Click to View MoreBar Associations cannot legally prevent advocates from representing accused individuals. The Supreme Court categorizes collective boycotts as unconstitutional. The Indian Constitution, under Articles 21, 22(1), and 39A, strictly guarantees every citizen the absolute right to legal representation and a fair trial.
Click to View MoreThe criminalization of politics severely threatens democratic integrity by embedding money and muscle power within legislatures. Driven by judicial delays, expensive elections, and vote-bank politics, tackling this menace requires immediate disqualification norms, fast-track courts, state funding, and awakened voter participation.
Click to View MoreThe Tenth Schedule's Paragraph 4 exempts two-thirds of legislators merging from disqualification. Recent wholesale defections expose this loophole, transforming splits into legal mergers. Reforming the Speaker's adjudication power and defining mergers strictly prevents the anti-defection law's complete redundancy.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court ruled that walking on demarcated footpaths is a fundamental right under Articles 19 and 21, overriding motorized vehicular privileges. It mandates urban bodies to construct accessible pedestrian infrastructure, creating an enforceable duty independent of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court’s 100-metre elevation rule for the Aravallis threatens over 90% of India's oldest fold mountains. Urgent landscape-level conservation and the Aravalli Green Wall Project are critical to prevent desertification, water scarcity, and severe pollution across North-West India.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court is currently examining the misuse of Aadhaar as proof of citizenship and age. Governed strictly by the Aadhaar Act 2016, Aadhaar merely establishes resident identity for subsidies but legally cannot determine Indian citizenship, domicile, or date of birth.
Click to View MorePreventive detention laws in India allow the government to detain individuals without trial for up to three months to prevent potential crimes. Authorized under Article 22 of the Constitution, these laws protect national security and public order but face civil rights criticism.
Click to View MoreIndia's fragmented disability pensions currently leave millions vulnerable, as the nation spends merely 0.02% of its GDP on welfare. Establishing a Minimum Universal Disability Pension Floor Rate (MUDPFR) transforms discretionary state charity into guaranteed constitutional rights, driving robust economic growth
Click to View MoreThe PCPNDT Act 1994 prohibits sex selection to combat female foeticide and declining child sex ratios in India. Despite census improvements, the Supreme Court demands strict enforcement and meticulous record-keeping to eradicate deep-seated patriarchal biases and protect the girl child.
Click to View MoreThe Indian Constitution allows the executive to promulgate ordinances during emergencies under Articles 123 and 213. However, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that unfettered re-promulgation without legislative approval subverts democratic processes, violating the core principle of parliamentary supremacy.
Click to View MoreThe Aravalli Range, North India’s crucial dust and desertification shield, faces severe degradation. Recent Supreme Court rulings redefining the hills for mining regulations have sparked ecological concerns, amplifying the urgent need for the Aravalli Green Wall eco-restoration project.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved
