Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy:  THEHINDU

Context

Recently, the Supreme Court stayed a Delhi High Court judgment that had suspended the life sentence of former MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar in the 2017 Unnao rape case.

What is Suspension of Sentence?

When an accused is convicted, the sentence begins immediately. However, the convict can appeal to a higher court. 

• During this appeal, the appellate court has the power to pause (suspend) the sentence and grant bail. 
• This power is granted under Section 430 of the new Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

The Supreme Court has set clear guidelines for exercising this power based on the severity of the crime:

• For Short Sentences: Suspension is considered the norm. 
• The Court held in Bhagwan Rama Shinde Gosai vs State of Gujarat (1999) that courts should generally suspend short, fixed-term sentences unless there are compelling reasons not to.
• For Heinous Crimes (e.g., Life Imprisonment): Suspension is a rare exception. 
• It requires a detailed, objective assessment of the case, and the court must record its reasons in writing. 
• The Public Prosecutor must be given an opportunity to present arguments against the suspension.

The 'Public Servant' Controversy Under the POCSO Act

The Delhi High Court suspended Kuldeep Sengar's life sentence, ruling that an MLA is not a "public servant"; meant the aggravated POCSO charges were inapplicable, and he served the minimum seven years for the offence.

• The Legal Loophole: The POCSO Act, 2012, does not have its own definition of a "public servant." It borrows the definition from Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
• Contrasting Definitions: The IPC's definition is an exhaustive list that includes government officials and judges but does not explicitly mention elected legislators like MLAs or MPs. 
• The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, has a much broader definition that specifically includes them. 

This creates a legal anomaly: a lower-level government official is considered a "public servant" for aggravated offences under POCSO, while a MLA is not.  

Judicial Approach

'Purposive Interpretation' for Child Protection

The Supreme Court preferred a 'purposive interpretation' for social welfare laws like POCSO, meaning the law should achieve its objective, not be defeated by technicalities.

• Attorney General for India vs Satish (2021): The Supreme Court rejected the "skin-to-skin" interpretation of sexual assault, ruling that sexual intent, not the type of physical touch, was the key element.
• Independent Thought vs Union of India (2017): The Court struck down an IPC exception permitting husbands to have sex with minor wives (aged 15-18), prioritizing child protection and aligning the IPC's age of consent with POCSO's 18 years.

Strict Conditions for Suspending Life Sentences

The Supreme Court has established a high threshold for suspending life sentences in heinous crimes, which goes beyond just the time spent in jail.

Demonstrate a "Palpable Error": The convict must show a clear and obvious error in the trial court's judgment that makes their eventual acquittal highly likely. 

• A mere debatable point of law is not sufficient (As held in Omprakash Sahni vs. Jai Shankar Chaudhary & Anr., 2023).

Long Incarceration is Not the Only Factor: While a long period of incarceration is a relevant factor, it cannot be the sole reason for suspending a sentence in grave offences like rape or murder. 

• The court must balance the convict's liberty with the interests of justice and society (As held in Kishori Lal vs. Rupa & Ors., 2004).

Consider the Context and Gravity: Courts must weigh the gravity of the crime and the context in which it was committed. 

• In the Unnao case, the history of intimidation, violence against the survivor's family, and the custodial death of her father are critical factors that must be considered.

Way Forward

The Kuldeep Singh Sengar case serves as a critical test for the Indian justice system's ability to protect citizens from the abuse of power. The Supreme Court's stay offers an opportunity for course correction.

Legislative Action: Amend the POCSO Act to close the "public servant" loophole, either via a broad, self-contained definition or by linking it to the Prevention of Corruption Act's wider definition.

Judicial Consistency: Appellate courts must strictly follow Supreme Court standards for suspending sentences in heinous crimes, prioritizing the gravity of the offense and the survivor's safety.

Systemic Reforms: The case highlights the urgent need to strengthen witness protection and insulate the criminal justice system from powerful influences, upholding the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law (Article 14).

Source: THEHINDU