India’s trade deficit shrank to $6.6 billion in May 2025, down 30%, due to lower oil prices and a 9.4% rise in services exports to $32.4 billion. Total exports grew 2.8% to $71.1 billion, despite a 2.2% drop in merchandise exports to $38.7 billion, while non-petroleum exports rose 5.1%.
Copyright infringement not intended
Picture Courtesy: THE HINDU
India’s overall trade deficit narrowed to $6.6 billion in May 2025, down nearly 30% over its level in May last year.
A trade deficit occurs when the value of a country's imports exceeds the value of its exports. It is a key indicator of an economy's health and its trade relationships with other nations.
The trade balance is calculated by considering two main components:
A country's overall trade balance is the sum of its merchandise and services trade balances.
Data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry indicates a significant narrowing of India's overall trade deficit in May 2025.
Total Exports => India's total exports (merchandise and services combined) grew by 2.8% to reach $71.1 billion.
Total Imports => Overall imports $77.75 billion, saw a slight contraction of 1%, primarily due to a fall in global oil prices.
Merchandise Trade
Merchandise Exports => There was a 2.2% contraction in merchandise exports, which stood at $38.7 billion. A key reason for this dip is the decline in global oil prices.
Non-Petroleum Exports => Non-petroleum exports showed a growth of 5.1%, indicating resilience in other sectors.
Merchandise Imports => Merchandise imports also contracted by 1.7%. However, non-petroleum imports saw a substantial increase of 10%, suggesting strong domestic demand.
Services Trade
Services Exports => The services sector continues to be a major strength for the Indian economy. Services exports grew by 9.4% to reach $32.4 billion in May 2025. This strong performance was the primary driver of the overall export growth.
Services Imports => Services imports also saw a modest increase of 1.5%.
Services Trade Surplus => The services sector generated an estimated trade surplus of $14.65 billion in May 2025.
A trade deficit is not inherently bad, but a large and persistent one can have several economic implications.
Currency Depreciation => A higher demand for foreign currency (to pay for imports) than the supply of domestic currency (from export earnings) can put downward pressure on the Indian Rupee.
Economic Dependence => A high deficit, particularly for essential goods, can indicate dependence on other countries.
Financing the Deficit => The deficit must be financed by a surplus in the capital account, meaning the country needs to attract foreign investment or borrow from abroad.
However, a trade deficit can also be a sign of a growing economy that is importing capital goods and raw materials to boost its productive capacity.
Must Read Articles:
India's Trade Trends, Trade Deficit
Source:
|
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Consider the following statements regarding the economic implications of a trade deficit: 1. A country running a trade deficit is a net borrower from the rest of the world. 2. The existence of a trade deficit unequivocally signifies a weak and uncompetitive domestic economy. 3. A persistent trade deficit invariably leads to the depreciation of the domestic currency in the forex market. How many of the above statements are correct? A) Only one B) Only two C) All three D) None Answer: A Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. A trade deficit (more imports than exports) means a country consumes more than it produces. To pay for this excess consumption, the country must borrow from abroad or sell its assets to foreigners. This inflow of foreign capital (e.g., through FDI, FPI, or loans) on the capital account finances the deficit on the current account. Therefore, the country is, by definition, a net borrower. Statement 2 is incorrect. A trade deficit can arise from positive factors as well. For example, a rapidly growing economy with high investment demand may import large amounts of capital goods and technology. In this case, the trade deficit signals a strong investment climate and future growth prospects, not necessarily a weak economy. The United States, for example, has run a persistent trade deficit for decades while remaining a dominant global economy. Statement 3 is incorrect. This statement uses the word "invariably," which is a strong claim. While a persistent trade deficit creates downward pressure on a currency (since more domestic currency is sold to buy foreign goods), this effect is not automatic. If the country attracts sufficient capital inflows (FDI, FPI) that exceed the trade deficit, its currency can remain stable or even appreciate. Foreign investors' confidence in the economy can easily offset the trade imbalance. |
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved
