The CAG report warns against unsustainable state debt, stressing that unchecked borrowing risks economic stability. A balanced strategy of fiscal discipline, improved revenues, and strategic spending, with Centre-state cooperation, is essential to protect long-term growth, stability, and federal harmony.
Copyright infringement not intended
Picture Courtesy: INDIANEXPRESS
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) has released its first-ever decadal analysis of the fiscal health of Indian states.
Finding |
Key Data/Observation (Source: CAG Report) |
Explosive Debt Growth |
States' total public debt surged 3.39 times from ₹17.57 lakh crore to ₹59.60 lakh crore. |
Rising Debt Burden |
The debt-to-GSDP ratio (a key indicator of a state's ability to repay its debt) increased from 16.66% to 22.96% over the decade. |
State-wise Disparities |
Highest Debt Ratios: Punjab (40.35%), Nagaland (37.15%), West Bengal (33.70%). Lowest Debt Ratios: Odisha (8.45%), Maharashtra (14.64%), Gujarat (16.37%). |
"Golden Rule" Violation |
The "Golden Rule of Fiscal Policy" states that governments should borrow only for capital investments, not to fund daily expenses. However, at least 11 states violated this rule, using borrowed funds for revenue expenditure. |
Debt vs Revenue |
On average, state debt was about 150% of their total revenue receipts, indicating a high level of dependency on borrowing to function. |
Structural Fiscal Imbalance
States are responsible for nearly two-thirds of the country's public expenditure (on sectors like health, education, law and order), but they collect less than one-third of the total government revenues. This inherent mismatch forces them to borrow.
Impact of GST
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) system, introduced in 2017, centralized indirect tax collection. While it streamlined the tax system, it limited the fiscal autonomy of states to raise their own revenues independently.
The increasing use of central cesses and surcharges, which are not part of the divisible pool of taxes shared with states, further squeezes state finances.
High Reliance on Market Borrowings
States have increasingly turned to borrowing from the open market. These loans come with higher interest rates compared to other sources like central government loans, increasing the debt servicing cost.
Contingent Liabilities
State governments provide guarantees for loans taken by their public sector enterprises (e.g., for power distribution companies or infrastructure projects). These "off-budget" borrowings, known as contingent liabilities, create future financial obligations that are not always reflected in the official debt figures.
Threat to Fiscal Federalism
High debt levels increase states' dependence on the central government for funds and bailouts, weakening their fiscal autonomy and undermining federal structure.
Risk of a Debt Trap
A significant portion of state revenue is now used to pay interest on past loans. This leads to a vicious cycle where states must borrow more just to repay existing loans and interest, a situation known as a debt trap.
Reduced Developmental Spending
With more money going towards debt servicing, states have fewer resources for critical sectors like infrastructure, health, and education, which slow down long-term economic growth.
Widening Regional Disparities
States already struggling with high debt find it harder to invest in development, which worsen economic inequalities between fiscally healthy and fiscally stressed states.
Impact on Social Welfare
To control deficits, states may be forced to cut back on essential social welfare programs, which negatively affect the most vulnerable sections of the population.
Enhance Revenue Generation
Improve tax collection efficiency by using technology to plug leakages and expand the tax base.
Explore innovative non-tax revenue sources like monetizing public assets, improving mining royalties, and promoting tourism.
Rationalize Expenditure
Prioritize productive capital expenditure that creates long-term assets over populist revenue expenditure.
Review and rationalize inefficient subsidy programs to ensure they are well-targeted and do not strain state finances.
Prudent Debt Management:
Adhere strictly to the debt-to-GSDP limits set by the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act.
Explore options to refinance high-interest debt with lower-cost loans from sources like the National Small Savings Fund (NSSF) or specialized bonds (e.g., Green Bonds).
Strengthen Centre-State Fiscal Cooperation
The Finance Commission should recommend an adequate share of central taxes for states to address the vertical fiscal imbalance.
Ensure timely and predictable transfer of funds, including GST compensation dues, from the Centre to the states.
Improve Public Financial Management
Adopt performance-based budgeting, where expenditure is linked to specific outcomes.
Use technology for transparent procurement and efficient project management to reduce costs and delays.
The CAG's report is a critical wake-up call. While borrowing is a necessary tool for development, unsustainable levels of debt can cripple a state's economy and compromise its future. A balanced approach focusing on fiscal discipline, revenue enhancement, and strategic expenditure is essential.
Source: INDIANEXPRESS.
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Critically analyze how the increasing public debt of states impacts fiscal federalism in India. 150 words |
The main finding is that the combined public debt of all 28 states in India has more than tripled over a decade, increasing from ₹17.57 lakh crore in 2013-14 to ₹59.60 lakh crore in 2022-23.
According to the report, Punjab had the highest debt-to-GSDP ratio at 40.35%, followed by Nagaland (37.15%) and West Bengal (33.70%) in 2022-23.
The lowest debt-to-GSDP ratios were recorded in Odisha (8.45%), Maharashtra (14.64%), and Gujarat (16.37%).
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved