India is shifting from the energy-focused PAT scheme to the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) to mitigate industrial greenhouse gases. This strategy safeguards export competitiveness against the EU CBAM while supporting India’s 2070 net-zero target.
Click to View MoreThe Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) is a bilateral climate framework between India and Japan under Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement. It facilitates low-carbon technology transfer and climate finance, generating shared carbon credits (ITMOs) to help both nations achieve their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) while preventing double counting.
Click to View MoreThe 2026 Bonn Climate Conference (SB64) focused on operationalizing the $300 billion NCQG, introducing a 35% global electrification target by 2035, and finalizing Article 6 carbon market rules. India fiercely defended CBDR-RC, opposing new obligations and demanding equitable, grant-based climate finance.
Click to View MoreCarbon markets under Paris Agreement Article 6 allow nations to trade emission reductions globally. While they drive green investments and tech transfer, severe concerns like greenwashing, human rights violations, and over-crediting demand strict UN safeguards and transparent domestic policies like India's CCTS.
Click to View MoreThe Bonn Climate Conference 2026 establishes a crucial 35% global electrification target by 2035. It highlights the urgent shift from pledges to implementation, prioritizing climate finance, adaptation, and honoring equity principles like CBDR-RC to support developing nations like India.
Click to View MoreIndia urgently demands equitable climate finance to bridge massive adaptation funding gaps. While the NCQG targets $300 billion annually, developing nations require $5-6 trillion by 2030. Achieving global climate justice necessitates transparent, grant-based capital and eliminating protectionist green trade barriers.
Click to View MoreThe Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) faces depletion by 2027, with only $448 million provided against a $400 billion annual requirement. This funding gap threatens vulnerable nations like India. Experts advocate for mandatory reparations through innovative climate taxes.
Click to View MoreIndian agriculture, employing 45% of workers, faces rising climate risks and ranks ninth on the Climate Risk Index. With only 24% of required adaptation finance secured, mostly public, private investment remains low. Building resilience needs blended finance, PPPs, clear green taxonomy, and stronger global collaboration like GCF.
Click to View MoreNITI Aayog’s report Scenarios Towards Viksit Bharat and Net Zero outlines a path to a $30 trillion economy by 2047 and Net Zero by 2070, requiring $22.7 trillion investment with a $6.5 trillion gap. It stresses renewable expansion, critical minerals security, and a just coal transition.
Click to View MoreThe Union Budget 2026–27 stresses “Green Growth” with allocations for CCUS, PM Surya Ghar solar, and nuclear energy, linking climate strategy to EU CBAM pressures and industrial decarbonization; however, funding remains below Net Zero 2070 needs, demanding blended finance and stronger green procurement to close the intent–outcome gap.
Click to View MoreThe UNEP State of Finance for Nature 2026 report highlights a severe global imbalance in environmental finance, revealing that more than $30 is spent on activities that harm nature for every $1 invested in protecting it. Nature-negative financial flows reached around $7.3 trillion annually, while funding for nature-based solutions (NbS) stood at only $220 billion. Harmful subsidies for fossil fuels, industrial agriculture, and resource-intensive sectors continue to dominate global spending patterns. Although investment in NbS has shown modest growth and some decline in fossil fuel financing is visible, progress remains far too slow. UNEP warns that NbS funding must rise to at least $571 billion per year by 2030 to meet global climate, biodiversity, and land restoration targets. Without redirecting financial systems toward nature-positive investments, the triple planetary crisis of climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution will intensify.
Click to View MoreThe UNEP report exposes a stark 30:1 imbalance, with nature-harming finance vastly exceeding investments in Nature-based Solutions, deepening the triple planetary crisis. It urges repurposing harmful subsidies and scaling public–private capital. For India, despite CAMPA and Namami Gange, mobilising private finance and reforming subsidies remain key challenges.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved
