Copyright infringement not intended
Picture Courtesy: INDIAN EXPRESS
The fragmentation of Western unity into a ‘multi-polar West’ offers India a strategic opportunity to engage diverse Western powers for technology, defense, and trade while strengthening its strategic autonomy.
|
Read all about: INDIA'S TIES WITH WESTERN NATIONS l LOOK WEST POLICY l INDIA AS THE VOICE OF THE GLOBAL SOUTH l WHAT IS DIASPORA DIPLOMACY? l INDIA IN AN UNCERTAIN WORLD |
The unity of the Western world—especially since the end of the Cold War—has been weakening. Several fault lines have emerged that make the West less of a monolithic bloc.
US–Europe Divide over Security & Burden Sharing
Ukraine war has exposed disagreements in Europe over how much to bear financially, militarily, and politically. The US remains deeply engaged, but EU countries differ on how much to commit.
Some European states worry about escalation risks and prefer diplomatic/negotiated outcomes; others push for stronger NATO commitments.
Transatlantic Economic Tensions
The U.S. has reintroduced strong industrial policy and protectionist measures (eg. tariffs on steel, aluminium, autos from the EU) under its “Section 232” and related trade tools.
The EU is pushing back – imposing counter-tariffs, emphasizing regulatory sovereignty (“green regulations”, carbon border adjustment etc.).
Intra-European Divisions
“Old Europe” (France, Germany, Benelux) vs “New Europe” (Eastern EU states, Baltic states) differ on priorities: Russian policy, energy dependence, migration.
Divisions between liberal democratic norms vs populist-oriented politics: some European countries have populist governments critical of the EU's human rights push, some emphasise national sovereignty over collective EU decision-making.
Multipolarity within the West
States like Germany and France now assert more independent strategic instincts, sometimes at odds with the U.S.
The EU itself seeks to reduce dependencies (energy, technology) especially vis-à-vis both the US and China.
So the West is no longer a single, tightly aligned bloc. It’s more a network of overlapping alliances with both cooperation and competition.
Because the West is no longer united, India has more room to engage different Western powers separately.
Western powers no longer expect perfect alignment. For example, European countries emphasise climate, trade regulation, social norms; the US emphasise security and alignment on China or Russia. India can pick and choose issue-based alignment.
Competition among Western powers gives India more negotiating leverage: each seeks India as a partner for trade, tech, security, climate etc.
|
Case Study The UK and India signed a free trade agreement in July 2025. India will cut tariffs on 90% of UK imports; UK will reduce or eliminate duties on some Indian exports (99% of Indian exports to UK zero duty). Bilateral trade to increase by £25.5 billion annually. India-EU negotiations Goods exports from India to the EU have increased in recent years: from about $41.36 billion in 2020–21 to $75.76 billion in 2024-25. The India-EU FTA has been under negotiation. Both sides aim to conclude the agreement by the end of 2025. India-France defence cooperation India & France reaffirmed plans to increase military/defence technology cooperation: joint manufacturing, technology transfer (e.g. missile systems, helicopter & jet engines), co-development, and joint naval / air exercises. India-US engagements (Indo-Pacific, tech/defence) Despite some trade tensions (50% USA tariff on India), both nations continue to prioritize and deepen their strategic partnership. Key areas of ongoing collaboration include the Indo-Pacific, defense technology, and critical technology. |
Diversified Partnerships
India can align with different partners for different issue areas. E.g., for defence co-production with France, for digital/AI regulation with the EU, for investment & supply chain diversification with the US.
This diversification enhances India’s strategic autonomy — India is less forced to accept all of one partner’s conditions; it can choose the best deal for each domain.
Economic Leverage
Because Western powers compete to engage India (market, growth rates, per-capita potential, strategic position), India can negotiate better terms: lower tariffs, better tech transfer, favorable investment environments.
India’s export numbers are rising with the EU, suggesting western markets are increasingly open.
Global South Bridge Role
India can play mediator between Western powers and Global South concerns (climate justice, development, trade equity).
In multilateral forums (G20, WTO, UN, COP), India can argue for frameworks that are more responsive to developing-country needs, since Western powers are fragmented and some may be more open to India's voice.
Balancing Expectations
Western nations will expect India to align (or voice support) on issues like the Ukraine war, sanctions, democracy, human rights, China’s assertiveness etc. If India is seen as non-aligned/all over, this may lead to diplomatic pressure.
There may be trade-off between strategic interest and values/norms: e.g., pressure to take side in geopolitical competition.
Trade, Tech, & Regulatory Tensions
Western partners impose regulatory standards (climate, environment due diligence, data protection, supply chain transparency). India’s industries may struggle to comply if standards are high, or costs high.
Tariffs, carbon border adjustment mechanisms (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in EU) are points of friction. India may be asked to match climate standards that impose costs.
Perception and Consistency
India must guard against the view that it is an opportunistic or “satellite-switching” partner: friendly with all but committed to none. This could erode trust.
Domestic audiences may criticise too close alignment with Western norms or foreign policy stances that conflict with India’s interests (e.g. non-interference, relations with China/Russia).
Over-extension Risk
Engaging many partners at once across sectors (defence, trade, climate, tech) risks stretching capacity — diplomatic, bureaucratic, negotiating bandwidth.
Also risk that strategic deals are signed, but implementation lags—policy coherence, domestic infrastructure, legal/regulation willingness matter.
Craft Multi-Layered Engagement
For each partner, establish deep bilateral deals and engage at multilateral forums. E.g., bilateral Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)/Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA), defence manufacturing agreements, tech collaboration; while also shaping norms via G20, Quad, etc.
Promote Strategic Convergence
India should communicate its own vision (e.g. its Indo-Pacific vision) and encourage Western partners to align with it where their own interests overlap.
Push for shared infrastructure/finance initiatives, maritime security cooperation, connectivity projects (for example India-Middle East-Europe corridor).
Institutionalize Economic Ties
Fast-track implementation of the UK-India FTA. Ensure trade facilitation, removal of non-tariff barriers, regulatory coherence, easing visa / professional mobility where possible.
For the EU, ensure India meets regulatory standards (for environment, digital, labour), so the FTA is not hampered by compliance gaps.
Maintain Strategic Autonomy & Issue-Based Cooperation
India should preserve the option to decide case by case. Not all Western partners will agree on everything, so India must choose alignment where its own interest is served.
Use diplomatic tools (public diplomacy, soft power, normative positions) to show consistency.
Proactive agenda setting
Instead of only reacting to Western offers, India should shape what it wants: e.g. global norms on technology regulation, climate justice, supply chain resilience, digital governance.
Reformed multilateralism
Push for stronger, more inclusive multilateral institutions (UN, WTO, IMF) where Global South has more voice.
Rules-based but multipolar order
Not dominance of any one power, but a system where multiple major powers respect sovereignty, international law, and norms.
Technology equity & climate justice
Negotiating for fair transition financing, technology transfer, ensuring developing countries are not left behind when emission standards, carbon taxes etc. come into force globally.
Institutional strength at home
Boosting India’s R&D, supply chain capacity, regulatory frameworks, infrastructure. Diplomatic gains matter only if India can deliver on what it commits, and be a stable, reliable partner.
India can transform Western fragmentation into strategic advantage by carefully balancing partnerships, leveraging diverse opportunities in trade and technology, and strengthening its institutional capacity to enhance its global influence.
Source: INDIAN EXPRESS
|
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. The fragmentation of the West presents a paradoxical opportunity for India's strategic autonomy. Critically analyze. 250 words |
It implies that India can now practice 'Non-Alignment 2.0,' maximizing benefits by engaging with distinct Western poles (US, EU, UK, individual states) without adhering to a single collective agenda.
Strategic Autonomy is India’s ability to make sovereign foreign policy and security decisions based purely on its national interests, irrespective of external pressure from any major power bloc.
The main risk is the potential for miscalculation, where deep bilateral ties with one Western pole (e.g., the US) could antagonize others (e.g., France/EU), demanding deft diplomatic balancing.
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved