Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.
Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025, with the Rajya Sabha.
The Bill seeks to modernise India’s mining law to secure supplies of critical and strategic minerals, boost exploration (including overseas), and improve the commercial use of mineral resources.
Parliament cleared the bill in August 2025 amid government claims of resource security and criticism over federal, environmental, and social safeguards.
The global green and digital transitions have sharply increased demand for minerals such as lithium, nickel, cobalt, and rare earths. India imports many of these inputs.
The government frames the amendment as necessary to reduce import dependence, build resilient supply chains, and attract investment into exploration and value addition.
The bill forms part of a broader National Critical Mineral Mission, which the government says will include large funds for exploration, including overseas acquisitions.
Feature |
Captive Mines |
Non-Captive Mines |
Recent Change (MMDR Amendment Act, 2021) |
Ownership |
Owned by a company for its use |
Open mines, production can be used or sold |
– |
Usage |
Minerals/coal only for the company’s consumption (e.g., power plants, steel plants) |
Minerals/coal can be used for own use and also sold in the open market |
– |
Sale of Output |
Not allowed (earlier) |
Allowed |
Now allowed for captive mines as well |
Legal Provision |
Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, empowered the Centre to reserve mines for end-use (captive) |
Not restricted |
The distinction between captive & non-captive mines was removed. |
Post-2021 Situation |
Captive mines can also sell up to 50% of their production (after meeting their own needs), subject to royalty and additional charges |
Already allowed earlier |
Ensures a level playing field |
The government’s argument is straightforward: critical minerals are central to electric vehicles, batteries, renewable energy, and defence. Domestic exploration and overseas acquisitions can secure long-term supply, reduce import bills, create jobs, and encourage allied industries. Reforming old statutory limits (1957 Act) is presented as a way to attract investment and modernise the sector.
Mining is a state subject under the Constitution, and several provisions of the bill expand central direction or create national mission mechanisms that affect states’ roles.
State governments and some regional MPs raised concerns in Parliament about centre-state balance, royalty and revenue sharing, and the right of states to regulate minerals within their territory. Any lasting solution must respect federal fiscal space and involve states in implementation.
Mining has long-standing environmental costs — land disturbance, water stress, biodiversity loss, and community displacement. While the bill references mineral conservation and zero-waste ideas, critics warn that easing norms to accelerate critical-mineral production can risk ecological safeguards and community rights (including under forest and land laws) if not strictly enforced.
Strong environmental impact assessment, local consent, rehabilitation, and benefit-sharing are necessary to prevent conflict and injustice.
If implemented well, the reforms could: reduce import dependence for key inputs, attract technology and capital for deep-seated mineral extraction, enable mineral trading and value addition, and support the green economy. However, the benefits depend on transparent auctions, accountable use of public funds (including overseas investment), and ensuring mining revenues reach local communities and states.
Securing minerals abroad (reports mention interest in countries like Zambia, Argentina, and Australia) is a clear geopolitical step, similar to how nations secure energy assets.
Overseas stakes can protect supply chains but also expose India to diplomatic risk and governance challenges in host countries. Careful diplomacy, commercial prudence, and compliance with international norms will be essential.
Key challenges include: capacity for large-scale geological exploration, creating transparent market structures, coordinating centre-state actions, environmental clearance bottlenecks, and ensuring local consent and rehabilitation.
Financing overseas purchases raises questions of public accountability and commercial due diligence. The success of the bill will rely more on institutional capacity and implementation than on the law alone.
READ ABOUT Council on Energy, Environment and Water recommendations- Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW)
The Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill, 2025, is an important policy step to secure minerals vital for India’s economic and green transition. Its promise will be fulfilled only if reforms are implemented transparently, with strong environmental safeguards, genuine federal consultation, and clear mechanisms to protect local communities and public money.
Source: DOWN TO EARTH
PRACTICE QUESTION Q. Critically examine the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025, highlighting its role in securing critical minerals while balancing federal, environmental, and social concerns. (150 words) |
The Bill modernises India’s mining law to prioritise critical minerals, enable overseas exploration, and improve the commercial use of mineral resources.
It aims to secure supplies of critical minerals vital for EVs, batteries, defence, and renewable energy, reducing import dependence and boosting self-reliance.
Concerns include federal tensions over states’ rights, environmental risks, community displacement, and accountability in overseas mineral acquisitions.
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved