Rising religious conflict in secular public spaces challenges constitutional religious freedom, which allows restrictions for public order ('principled distance'). Conflicts stem from disruption and communal tension. The judiciary uses 'Essential Religious Practices' and 'Constitutional Morality' for balance. Resolution demands uniform, non-discriminatory regulation, dialogue, and responsible devotion.
Click to View MoreThe Bombay High Court questioned Maharashtra’s Election Commission for holding local polls without VVPATs, citing concerns over electoral transparency. Responding to a petition alleging violation of free and fair elections, the court sought justification for the SEC’s “logistical constraints,” prompting a review of voter rights and accountability.
Click to View MoreThe Model Code of Conduct is a consensus-based guideline enforced by the Election Commission to ensure fair elections. Originating in Kerala, it regulates parties, prevents misuse of state power, and maintains neutrality. Its voluntary nature and digital-era challenges highlight the need for stronger legal backing and reforms.
Click to View MoreThe Model Youth Gram Sabha (MYGS) revitalizes grassroots democracy by simulating Gram Sabha proceedings in schools. It offers experiential learning aligned with NEP 2020, combats youth apathy, nurtures leadership, and builds awareness of civic responsibilities, promoting inclusive, transparent, and participatory rural governance for future citizens.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court’s order restoring MGNREGS funding to West Bengal reinforces the right to work and judicial oversight in welfare delivery. Arising from fiscal federalism tensions, it stresses the need for stronger social audits and cooperative Centre-State relations to safeguard rural livelihoods and accountability.
Click to View MoreThe Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision reflects its commitment to clean and inclusive elections. Mandated by the Representation of the People Act, 1950, it ensures accurate voter rolls by removing ineligible entries, adding eligible citizens, and addressing demographic shifts—strengthening the integrity of India’s democratic process.
Click to View MoreDynastic politics in India arises from a lack of party democracy and high election costs, favoring "dynasts" for their brand value and electoral success. This trend, reinforced by social hierarchies, undermines meritocracy, equal opportunity, and the quality of governance, preventing ordinary citizens from participating effectively in the political process.
Click to View MoreThe Election Commission of India allocates fair broadcast time on Doordarshan and All India Radio to recognized parties, based on performance, ensuring balanced voter access. Rooted in the Representation of the People Act, 1951, this upholds fairness, equality, and democratic principles.
Click to View MoreThe Election Commission of India ensures electoral integrity through structured forms under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. Forms 6, 6A, 7, and 8 empower citizens to register, update, or correct voter details, ensuring transparent, accurate, and inclusive electoral rolls for a robust democracy.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court has ruled that Aadhaar, a voter ID system, is a valid proof of identity but not citizenship, following a petition for voter list revision in Bihar. The ruling upholds the voluntary nature of the Aadhaar-Voter ID link, ensuring privacy and preventing disenfranchisement, demonstrating judicial oversight.
Click to View MoreDowry results in violence against women, leading to deaths and severe harassment, particularly among vulnerable socioeconomic groups. Despite stringent laws, including the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), its practice persists due to social sanction, patriarchy, and low conviction rates, highlighting a wide gap between law and implementation.
Click to View MoreThe 130th Constitutional Amendment Bill, 2025, seeks to criminalize politics by amending Articles 75, 164, and 239AA, requiring the removal of Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, or ministers for 30 consecutive days for serious charges. The government supports this move for political morality and governance, but opposition concerns arise about potential misuse and violating the principle of innocence.
Click to View More
© 2025 iasgyan. All right reserved