Indian judiciary pioneers a 'Swadeshi Jurisprudence', developing an indigenous AI ecosystem to tackle massive case backlogs and improve linguistic access. The Draft AI Regulations 2026 mandate human oversight, strictly prohibiting automated adjudication to safeguard constitutional integrity.
Click to View MoreThe Supreme Court's 2026 draft regulations permit artificial intelligence for administrative tasks but strictly ban its use in core judicial decision-making. The framework emphasizes human primacy, transparency, and accountability to protect constitutional rights from algorithmic bias and opacity.
Click to View MoreAI mental health tools improve access and affordability but create serious risks. Data privacy, bias and the absence of human empathy can harm vulnerable users. India must enforce strong rules like the DPDP Act and ensure a human-in-the-loop model so AI supports, not replaces, real care.
Click to View MoreAI can transform Indian education through personalized learning, aligning with the National Education Policy. However, its successful and fair integration requires addressing challenges like the digital divide, data privacy, and algorithmic bias. This will necessitate investments in infrastructure, teacher training, and ethical regulations.
Click to View MoreJudiciary is integrating AI for efficient, transparent, and accessible justice. Initiatives like SUPACE and SUVAS help judges with research and translation. However, AI presents ethical challenges like data privacy and algorithmic bias. A human-centric approach is crucial for fairness, justice, and accountability.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved
