The Supreme Court raised concern over unchecked AI use in legal drafting after fake citations surfaced. While tools like SUVAS and SUPACE aid administration, accuracy remains paramount. Citing risks of bias and privacy breaches, it urged human oversight and sovereign AI safeguards.
Click to View MoreKarnataka leads judicial reform by integrating AI into district courts to reduce pendency and streamline administration. The judiciary uses AI for research and case management to boost efficiency and transparency, while enforcing strict ethical safeguards to prevent bias and uphold impartial, speedy justice for every citizen.
Click to View MoreJudiciary is integrating AI for efficient, transparent, and accessible justice. Initiatives like SUPACE and SUVAS help judges with research and translation. However, AI presents ethical challenges like data privacy and algorithmic bias. A human-centric approach is crucial for fairness, justice, and accountability.
Click to View More
© 2026 iasgyan. All right reserved