🔔This Durga Puja, Invest in your future with our exclusive festive offer. Get up to ₹15,000 off on WBCS ONLINE CLASSROOM PROGRAMME with coupon code Puja15K.

In referring to Elections under the Cholas, PM Modi invoked a historical truth

5th August, 2025

Copyright infringement not intended

Source: Indian Express

Context

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech at Gangaikonda Cholapuram on July 27, 2025, emphasized India's indigenous democratic traditions that predate the Magna Carta.

Indian Democracy: An Ancient Legacy

  • The Magna Carta (1215) was a landmark in European democracy, curbing absolute monarchy and granting certain rights to people.

  • India’s democratic roots are much older, dating back to the 5th century BCE, with credible historical evidence.

Early Democratic Practices in India

  • Democracy in ancient India existed in villages, small communities, and tribal societies, where collective decision-making was common.

  • People used discussion and consensus to arrive at decisions, showcasing participatory governance.

Kautilya and the Arthashastra

  • In his treatise Arthashastra, Kautilya described the role of ‘Samghas’ (local unions).

  • He emphasized that a state functions better when governed through decentralised institutions.

  • These samghas acted like self-governing bodies, similar to modern Panchayati Raj institutions.
  • Ancient Indian systems highlight a strong tradition of local self-governance.

  • The concept of grassroots democracy, prevalent in today’s governance model, has its origins in India’s ancient political thought.

  • This legacy reinforces that democratic values are deeply embedded in Indian civilisation, not just borrowed from the West.

The Chola Era: A Way for Modern Democracy

Uthiramerur Inscription: Evidence of Ancient Democracy

  • The Uthiramerur inscription (around 920 AD) in the Vaikuntaperumal Temple (Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu) provides a detailed account of local self-governance under the Chola dynasty during the rule of Parantaka Chola.

  • It is often described as a constitutional document due to its elaborate rules and procedures for governance.

  • It outlines:

    • Formation of wards

    • Eligibility criteria for candidates

    • Disqualifications

    • Mode of elections

    • Committee roles and functions

    • Mechanism to remove corrupt officials

  • Right to Recall: Villagers could remove elected representatives who failed in their duties.

Kudavolai System: Ancient Ballot-Based Election

  • The Kudavolai system (meaning “ballot pot system”) was the electoral method used in Uthiramerur.

  • Steps of the process:

    • Names of eligible candidates were written on palm leaves.

    • Leaves were placed in a pot.

    • A young, neutral boy (free from local bias) drew one leaf.

  • The system was designed to ensure transparency, impartiality, and fairness.

  • Elected members served for one-year fixed terms and were re-elected through the same process.

Eligibility Criteria: High Standards for Public Office

  • Candidates had to:

    • Be between 35 to 70 years of age.

    • Own tax-paying land with a house on it.

    • Be well-versed in sacred texts or administrative knowledge.

  • These norms ensured that only capable and morally upright individuals could contest.

Disqualifications: Purifying Public Life

  • Individuals were disqualified if they:

    • Defaulted on loans

    • Consumed alcohol

    • Committed moral wrongdoings

    • Failed to submit accounts from previous positions

  • Even close relatives of such persons were barred from contesting.

Accountability Mechanism

  • Those guilty of:

    • Embezzlement

    • Neglect of duty

  • Faced removal from office and were barred from re-election for up to seven generations in serious cases.

  • This demonstrates a rigorous commitment to ethics and accountability.

Legacy and Modern Relevance

  • These village assemblies were not advisory bodies but self-governing institutions with real power.

  • They show that democratic traditions existed in ancient India long before modern systems.

  • The Chola model reflects values of ethics, fairness, and civic participation.

Comparisons and Contemporary Relevance of India’s Democratic Traditions

  • Chola-era governance had strict anti-corruption measures, including lifetime or generational bans on corrupt officials.

  • In contrast, modern Indian politics often sees convicted politicians return to power, reflecting a decline in accountability.

India’s Electoral Legacy Reflects:

  • Transparency in public administration.

  • Accountability of leaders to the people.

  • Ethical leadership, upheld through moral codes.

  • Active citizen participation, even in ancient local self-governments like Chola sabhas.

Modern Relevance of Indigenous Democratic Practices:

  • Reinforces the idea that democracy in India is homegrown, not a colonial gift.

  • Acts as a counter-narrative to the global erosion of democratic values.

  • Highlights India’s resilience, originality, and civilizational commitment to democracy.

Challenges in Reclaiming Indigenous Democratic Traditions

  • Political Criminalization: Despite legal convictions, many leaders continue to contest and win elections, diluting democratic ethics.

  • Erosion of Ethical Standards: Moral accountability, once central to ancient governance like the Chola system, is often missing in present-day politics.

  • Low Public Awareness: Most citizens are unaware of India’s indigenous democratic legacy, leading to over-dependence on Western democratic models.

  • Weak Local Governance: Institutions like Gram Sabhas, inspired by ancient assemblies, are often undermined by bureaucratic interference and political apathy.

  • Global Influence: Overemphasis on Western benchmarks of democracy overshadows India’s own historical contributions.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen Political Accountability: Enforce strict disqualification laws for convicted politicians to restore public trust.

  • Revive Ethical Leadership: Promote values-based political training inspired by historical models like Chola sabhas.

  • Curriculum Reform: Include indigenous governance systems in education to raise awareness.

  • Empower Local Bodies: Give real power and autonomy to Panchayati Raj Institutions, echoing ancient self-governance systems.

  • Public Engagement: Encourage active citizen participation and deliberative democracy to rebuild a participatory culture.

Conclusion:

  • India's democratic ethos is deeply rooted in its civilizational history.

  • Historical examples like Chola administration prove that democracy is indigenous and codified, not externally imposed.

  • Recognizing and reclaiming this legacy is crucial for building a more ethical, participatory, and accountable polity in modern India.

Practice Question


Q. Explain the nature of democratic institutions and election methods in ancient and medieval India, with a focus on the Chola period.



Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

PM Modi referred to elections under the Cholas to highlight India’s ancient democratic traditions and ethical governance.

Yes, inscriptions show that local self-governments like sabhas held elections with strict rules on eligibility and integrity.

It shows that democracy in India is not foreign but rooted in its own history, emphasizing values like transparency and accountability.

They imposed lifetime or generational bans on corrupt individuals, unlike modern systems that often allow convicted leaders to return.

Let's Get In Touch!