Copyright infringement not intended

Source: Sputnik India

Context

Manual scavenging and septic tank desludging continue to be a major public health hazard in India, despite varied legislative frameworks.

What is Septic Tank Desludging?

• Septic Tank Desludging refers to cleaning underground tanks where household toilet waste is collected.
  
  
• It is a vital sanitation activity, but is marred by a dangerous business model, often leading to worker deaths due to poor safety practices.
  
  
• Highlights significant enforcement gaps and social justice challenges.
  

Reality of Septic Tank Cleaning in India

• Hazardous Nature:
  
  
• Cleaning of septic tanks, gutters, and sewers is dangerous due to poisonous gases and low oxygen levels.
  
  
• Deaths often occur when one worker collapses inside, and others attempting rescue also die.
  
  
• Worker Deaths:
  
  
• 150 workers died in 2022 and 2023 during hazardous cleaning (Ministry of Social Justice).
  
  
• Social audit of 54 workers revealed:
  
  
• 38 were hired by local contractors.
  
  
• Only 5 were on government payroll, showing lack of accountability.
  
  
• Lack of Protective Equipment (PPE):
  
  
• In 2024, 57,758 workers were identified as engaged in hazardous cleaning nationwide.
  
  
• Only 16,791 PPE kits supplied, exposing most workers to deadly environments.
  
  
• Insufficient Social Protection:
  
  
• Fewer than 14,000 workers received health cards.
  
  
• Only 837 safety workshops conducted across 4,800 urban local bodies.
  
  
• Gap in Data Collection:
  
  
• Almost no data on sanitation workers in rural areas, making policy planning weak.

Why has hand scavenging continued despite regulations and schemes like as NAMASTE?

• Weak Enforcement of Legal Provisions and Court Orders: Despite the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Rehabilitation Act of 2013 and Supreme Court orders to annul infringing contracts and penalize key employers, enforcement remains weak. For example, in 2024, Parliament reported that 150 workers died in 2022-23 as a result of dangerous cleaning.
• inadequate Scheme Implementation and Underfunding: Inadequate financial support, inadequate outreach, and a lack of protective equipment or training all impede schemes such as NAMASTE. For example, only 16,791 of the 57,758 workers working in hazardous cleaning received PPE kits, while a meager ₹14 crore was given under NAMASTE, which is insufficient for mechanization in even one big city.
• Employer Liability Is Obscured by Subcontracting: The use of contractual and 'loaned' labour allows government and private companies to dodge responsibility for worker safety. For example, a social audit filed in Parliament discovered that just five of the 54 hazardous cleaning deaths involved personnel on government payroll, while the rest were 'loaned' to private companies, leaving responsibility unclear.
  

Legal Framework and Policy Measures

• Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and Rehabilitation Act (2013):
  
  
• Prohibits manual scavenging and provides for rehabilitation.
  
  
• Supreme Court Directives:
  
  
• Issued strict orders for penal action and compensation.
  
  
• Swachh Bharat Guidelines:
  
  
• Strongly discourage manual cleaning.
  
  
• National Action for Mechanised Sanitation Ecosystem (NAMASTE) Scheme (2023):
  
  
• Focus on mechanised cleaning using machines.
  
  
• Only ₹14 crore allocated, insufficient even for one major city.
  

Challenges in Implementation

• Ineffective Emergency Units:
  
  
• Emergency Response Sanitation Units exist mostly on paper, lacking funds and manpower.
  
  
• Accountability Issues:
  
  
• In case of a death, cases are filed against low-level supervisors, not the principal employer.
  
  
• Non-Enforcement of Supreme Court Orders:
  
  
• Directives to fix liability on principal employers and impose monetary penalties remain largely unimplemented.

How does a lack of rural data impede sanitation worker reforms?

• Exclusion from the Mechanization Scheme: Without good data on rural sanitation workers, projects like NAMASTE cannot expand their benefits (such as robotic cleaning or desludging machines) to villages. For example, in many Bihar gram panchayats, manual pit cleaning continues without equipment since workers are unregistered and so unaccounted for in policy rollouts.
• No Health and Safety Monitoring: The lack of worker enumeration means that occupational health hazards go overlooked, and safety training or PPE kits are not supplied in rural areas. For example, sanitation workers in Chhattisgarh's rural blocks have not received health cards or protective equipment, leaving them vulnerable to harmful gasses and illnesses.
• Obstructs Legal Accountability and Compensation: If workers are not documented, unintentional deaths are frequently unreported or misclassified, preventing families from receiving compensation and companies from being held accountable. For example, in a 2023 case in Madhya Pradesh, a worker died while cleaning a septic tank, but because to a lack of registration, the incident was classified as a common accident rather than a violation of the Manual Scavenging Act.
  

Way Forward

To eliminate hazardous manual cleaning and ensure worker safety, a multi-faceted approach backed by political will is essential.

1. Mechanisation and Regulation

• Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) must ensure complete mechanisation of sewer and septic tank cleaning without delay.
  
  
• Hazardous cleaning must become a licensed trade, ensuring training and safety workshops for certified workers.
  
  
• Operating without a valid certificate must be treated as a cognisable offence.
  

2. Financial Support for Transition

• The government must provide subsidies for machine purchases.
  
  
• Loans should be extended to workers and contractors to buy necessary equipment.
  
  
• These loans must be linked with guaranteed service contracts from municipalities, ensuring sustainable employment.
  

3. Accountability of Employers

• Principal employers must be held accountable for any worker deaths or unsafe practices, as mandated by the Supreme Court.
  
  
• Strict penalties and enforcement are crucial to prevent violations.
  

4. Inclusion of Rural Workers

• A comprehensive profiling of workers in rural areas is essential to understand the scale of hazardous cleaning nationwide.
  
  
• The national government must:
  
  
• Bring septic tank desludging under the Swachh Bharat rural budget.
  
  
• Extend NAMASTE scheme benefits (profiling, subsidies) to gram panchayats.
  

5. Political Will and Enforcement

• Laws and schemes can only work if rigorously enforced.
  
  
• Political will at all levels—local, state, and national—is key to ending hazardous cleaning.
  

Practice Question Q. Examine the key issues plaguing septic tank cleaning practices today. What measures should be undertaken to ensure safe, dignified, and mechanised sanitation work across the country?